Press Release
For Immediate
Release: January 21, 2005
Contact: Natalia Kennedy (212) 998-6736
Brennan
Center for Justice and Electronic Frontier Foundation
File Brief to Protect Creative Copying in Sound Recordings
New York,
NY- Today, the
Brennan Center
for Justice at NYU School of Law and the Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF) filed an amicus brief in Bridgeport
Music v. Dimension Films, challenging
the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ elimination of the “de minimis”
exception for copyright in sound recordings.
The brief argues that the de minimis rule is a longstanding and
essential component of all copyright
law, including sound recordings. The
rule allows artists to sample small amounts from earlier work to produce
new creations. In the visual arts, literature, and music, borrowing is
an intrinsic part of the creative process. The brief cites examples from
the collage artist Robert Rauschenberg to composers like Charles Ives
and John Cage, and literary landmarks like T.S. Eliot’s The Wasteland, made up largely of fragments from other works.
Congress also has recognized the importance
of protecting the de minimis rule for sound recording copyrights. In 1976, Congress overhauled the Copyright Act
and used inclusive language to “make clear that…infringement takes place
whenever all or any substantial portion of the actual sounds that go to
make up a copyrighted sound are reproduced.”
Clearly, Congress intended for the de minimis rule to apply
to all sound recordings.
“The Court of Appeals decision to target trivial borrowing
from sound recordings isn’t supported by copyright law or sound policy,”
says Marjorie Heins, coordinator of the Free Expression Policy Project
at the Brennan Center.
“It ignores the history and purpose of the Copyright Act and stifles creativity.”
The brief responds to a lawsuit brought by
Bridgeport Music and other owners of the song “Get off Your Ass and Jam.” A chord of that song was sampled in the track
“100 Miles and Runnin.” A federal
district court judge found the borrowing of this chord to be de minimis
and not in violation of copyright law.
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals reversed the decision. However, after receiving a petition for rehearing,
the judges agreed to reconsider. The
Brennan Center/EFF brief urges them to reverse their original ruling and
reinstate the de minimis rule.
For copies of the brief, go to http://www.fepproject.org/courtbriefs/bridgeport.pdf
The
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, founded in 1995, unites thinkers and
advocates in pursuit of a vision of inclusive and effective democracy.
The Center’s Free Expression Policy Project (FEPP) provides research and
advocacy on issues of free speech, copyright and media policy. Please
visit, www.fepproject.org
The
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is a non-profit public interest organization
dedicated to protecting civil liberties and free expression in the digital
world. Please visit, www.eff.org
Update:
In June 2005, the same three judges of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
who originally ruled against a "de minimis" rule for music sampling
decided not to change their earlier decision. See "Appeals
Court Reaffirms Its Tone-Deaf Approach to Music Sampling."
|