Site Last Updated
  Art
  Censorship
  Censorship
  History
  Censorship
  of Youth
  Copyright   Internet   Media
  Policy
  Political
  Speech
  Sex and   Censorship     Violence in   the Media

  Home
  About Us
Archives
  Commentaries
  Contact Us
  Court and Agency Briefs
  Fact Sheets
  Issues
  Links
  News
  Policy Reports
  Press
  Reviews


Search FEPP



Special Projects
The Information Commons

Nancy Kranich
Senior Research Fellow
Free Expression Policy Project

WHY WE NEED THE INFORMATION COMMONS

In one of the great ironies of the 21st century, public policy is threatening the advancement of "science and useful arts" rather than encouraging creativity and innovation. According to law professor Yochai Benkler,

Stakeholders from the older economy are using legislation, judicial opinions, and international treaties to retain the old structure. … As economic policy, letting yesterday's winners dictate the terms of tomorrow's economic competition is disastrous. [A]s social policy, missing an opportunity to enrich our freedom and enhance our justice while maintaining or even enhancing our productivity is unforgiveable.1

Stifling free expression and the free flow of ideas results in a controlled society, lacking diversity, equity, and democratic participation in the digital age. Already, the public has experienced a widening gap between those with and without access to communication and information technologies, skyrocketing costs, limited preservation and archiving abilities, restrictions on the ability to lend and dispose of electronic information products, blocking of massive amounts of constitutionally protected speech through Internet filters, and a reduction in the rights to make fair use of copyrighted works.

The concept of the information commons offers a fresh approach to the terms of the public policy debate, emphasizing the fundamental issues critical to our future as a democracy. It provides a useful framework for envisioning the public interest. It gives an opportunity to stake a claim in the future of the public sphere - to give a language from which we can explain how the extraordinary public assets invested in our information infrastructure deliver opportunities for all citizens to participate in our democracy.

The development of the information commons as both a metaphor and a new structure for access in the digital age fills a critical need. The commons elevates the role of individuals as more than just consumers in the marketplace, and shifts the focus to their rights and needs as citizens. Reviving a language of the commons is thus critical to the future of an open, democratic society, rooted in the words of James Madison:

A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy ... [A] people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.2

NEXT: SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

NOTES

1. Yochai Benkler, "The Battle over the Institutional Ecosystem of the Digital Environment," Communications of the ACM 44 (2): 84-90.

2. James Madison, Letter to W. T. Barry, August 4, 1822, in Letters and Other Writings of James Madison, Published by order of Congress. 4 volumes. Edited by Philip R. Fendall. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1865, III, p. 276.


The Free Expression Policy Project began in 2000 to provide empirical research and policy development on tough censorship issues and seek free speech-friendly solutions to the concerns that drive censorship campaigns. In 2004-2007, it was part of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. The FEPP website is now hosted by the National Coalition Against Censorship. Past funders have included the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation, the Nathan Cummings Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Educational Foundation of America, the Open Society Institute, and the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts.

All material on this site is covered by a Creative Commons "Attribution - No Derivs - NonCommercial" license. (See http://creativecommons.org) You may copy it in its entirely as long as you credit the Free Expression Policy Project and provide a link to the Project's Web site. You may not edit or revise it, or copy portions, without permission (except, of course, for fair use). Please let us know if you reprint!